internet litigation

Subscribe to internet litigation via RSS

On August 4, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a groundbreaking decision in Amazon.com Services, LLC v. Perplexity AI, addressing the legal status of so-called “agentic AI” tools, which help users expedite various online tasks, including buying goods and services. The Ninth Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction that had barred the AI company Perplexity from enabling users of its Comet Browser’s AI assistant feature to access the Amazon Store. In so doing, it became the first circuit to weigh in on the intersection between agentic AI and federal laws—specifically the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), which prohibits unauthorized access to protected computer systems.

Continue Reading Ninth Circuit Addresses CFAA and Agentic AI Tools in Groundbreaking Decision

On May 22, 2019, a federal district court largely denied a facial challenge by Disney, Viacom, and several online advertising networks to claims alleging these defendants violated the privacy rights of children by collecting data through online gaming apps.

In McDonald v. Kiloo APS,[1] the defendants consisted of two groups: the developers who created the gaming apps and made them available for download, and the mobile advertising and app monetization companies who provided software code inserted into the gaming apps to collect user data for advertising purposes. The defendants allegedly collected a variety of data from the children’s devices without appropriate consent, including the IP address; the specific device name; IDs for Apple and Android devices; the device’s International Mobile Equipment Identity; the timestamp at which an advertising event was recorded; and device fingerprint data (the user’s language, time zone, country, and mobile network).Continue Reading Federal Court Allows Children’s Online Privacy Claims Against Disney, Viacom, and Online Ad Networks That Collected Data from Gaming Apps to Go Forward