Unique Insights on Privacy and Data Protection Worldwide
Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in mental healthcare for functions such as clinical decision support, notetaking and transcription, symptom screening and triage, administrative and operational improvements, augmenting the provider-patient relationship, post-visit remote monitoring, and companionship.Continue Reading Legal Framework for AI in Mental Healthcare
On June 18, 2025, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas vacated most of the rules designed to enhance reproductive healthcare privacy promulgated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in 2024. More specifically, the court ruled in Purl v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al, No. 2:2024cv00228 (N.D. Tex. 2025) (the Decision) that the “Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule to Support Reproductive Health Care Privacy” (the “2024 HIPAA Rule”) is contrary to law because it unlawfully limits state public health laws; impermissibly redefines certain terms in contravention of federal law and in excess of statutory authority; and exceeds HHS’s authority. Regulations promulgated under HIPAA prior to the 2024 HIPAA Rule remain unchanged.Continue Reading Texas District Court Vacates 2024 HIPAA Rule Designed to Enhance Reproductive Healthcare Privacy, Effective Nationwide
On June 5, 2025, Nevada Governor Joe Lombardo signed AB 406, a law regulating the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for mental and behavioral healthcare. AB 406 comes as other states, such as Utah and New York, have taken steps to regulate AI chatbots, including AI chatbots providing mental health services. AB 406 prohibits offering AI systems designed to provide services that constitute the practice of professional mental or behavioral healthcare (such as therapy) and prohibits making representations that an AI system can provide such care. In addition, AB 406 limits how mental and behavioral healthcare professionals can use AI systems.[1] AB 406 takes effect on July 1, 2025.Continue Reading Nevada Passes Law Limiting AI Use for Mental and Behavioral Healthcare
On June 4, 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the appointment of Paula M. Stannard as the Director of the Office for Civil Rights (OCR). As Director, Stannard will lead the enforcement of the Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), as well as federal civil rights laws.Continue Reading HHS Announces New Director of Office for Civil Rights: What to Watch from the New Health Privacy Leader
On March 25, 2025, Utah Governor Spencer Cox signed HB 452, which establishes new rules for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) mental health chatbots accessible to any “Utah user,” defined as, “an individual located in the state at the time the individual accesses or uses a mental health chatbot.” Digital health companies and AI chatbot providers should take note of this new law to ensure compliance with its requirements.Continue Reading Utah Enacts Mental Health Chatbot Law
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently issued a unanimous Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry targeting the use of AI-related technologies for communicating with consumers.1 In the proposed rule, the FCC seeks to impose a broad definition for AI technologies subject to the requirements of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Companies using technology falling within the FCC’s proposed definition would be required to make certain disclosures under the TCPA to notify consumers that they are communicating with AI-technology. This proposal is the latest move by the FCC to tackle its largest source of consumer complaints: unwanted and illegal robocalls and robotexts.2 The proposed new rule may require companies to modify their current approach in engaging with consumers through AI-generated calls and/or texts, including potentially altering their current practices in collecting consent where necessary.Continue Reading FCC Issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding the Use of AI-Generated Technologies for Consumer Communications
On June 20, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas ordered the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to vacate its guidance that had restricted HIPAA-covered entities’ use of third party online tracking technologies, such as common website advertising and analytics tools. In vacating the guidance, the court held that the agency exceeded its authority by redefining what is considered protected health information (PHI) under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). While this order is a defeat for OCR’s guidance on online tracking technologies, regulated companies should react cautiously. The order could be appealed and potentially reversed, OCR could still bring enforcement actions in other circuits advancing their interpretation of PHI, and the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC’s) laws and state privacy laws could still apply.Continue Reading Texas District Court Vacates OCR’s HIPAA Bulletin on Online Tracking Technologies, But Issues Mixed Decision
