On December 3, 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced its highly anticipated and controversial proposed rule that primarily aims to bring data brokers within the scope of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Data brokers have long argued that they do not furnish “consumer reports,” and thus do not constitute “consumer reporting agencies” subject to the FCRA’s obligations. The CFPB catalogues the harms that have resulted from such a stance; namely, risks to national security, financial well-being, and personal safety when data brokers sell information to countries of concern, scammers, or stalkers. The proposed rule seeks to cover data brokers by clarifying key provisions within the definition of “consumer report.” The proposed rule also aims to shore up consumer protections under the FCRA by interpreting the definition of “consumer reporting agency” more broadly and permissible purposes for furnishing consumer reports more narrowly, such as consumer consent and legitimate business needs. The CFPB seeks public comment on the proposed rule, which must be received on or before March 3, 2025.Continue Reading CFPB Issues Proposed Rule to Cover Data Brokers Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jess Cheng
CFPB Releases Final Open Banking Rules: Key Takeaways for Fintech Companies
By Maneesha Mithal, Jess Cheng & Doo Lee on
Posted in Privacy
On October 22, 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced its long-awaited final rule on “Personal Financial Data Rights” (the Final Rule). The Final Rule implements Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which provides consumers the right to access and port their financial information between banks and other financial entities. For an analysis of the proposed rule, please see our analysis here.Continue Reading CFPB Releases Final Open Banking Rules: Key Takeaways for Fintech Companies
“Chevron is overruled”: How Loper Bright Will Change the Regulatory Law Landscape
By Tamara Brightwell, Amy Caiazza, Jess Cheng, Jamillia Ferris, Steffen Johnson, Maneesha Mithal, Maureen Ohlhausen, Brent Snyder, Rachel Burke, Kelsey Curtis, Rebecca Weitzel Garcia, Troy Jenkins & Evan Moore on
Posted in Regulatory
In a decision with far-ranging implications for federal administrative law, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (Loper Bright).1 The Supreme Court’s six-Justice majority held that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires courts interpreting agency regulations to determine independently whether the agencies have acted within their statutory authority, even where the statute at issue is ambiguous. In so holding, the Court overruled its 1984 decision in Chevron USA v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which for the last four decades had governed thousands of cases involving federal agency interpretations of ambiguous laws.Continue Reading “Chevron is overruled”: How Loper Bright Will Change the Regulatory Law Landscape