On July 23, 2025, the White House announced its long-awaited comprehensive AI Action Plan titled “Winning the AI Race: America’s AI Action Plan” (the Plan). The Plan is aimed at positioning the U.S. as the global leader in AI and is a follow up to President Donald Trump’s January 23, 2025, Executive Order on “Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence,” which revoked the Biden Administration’s prior AI Executive Order (Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence). The AI Action Plan contains more than 90 policy actions related to three key pillars: 1) Accelerating AI Innovation, 2) Building American AI Infrastructure, and 3) Leading in International AI Diplomacy and Security. This alert touches on all three pillars with a focus on the first, which outlines the Trump Administration’s strategic vision and policy recommendations to drive innovation in the American AI sector.Continue Reading White House Releases America’s AI Action Plan
Maureen Ohlhausen
New York Requires Disclosures for Personalized Pricing
Posted in Regulatory
In May 2025, New York State Governor Hochul signed Part X of New York’s annual budget, titled, “Personalized Pricing Transparency and Anti-Discrimination.” Part X, which took effect on July 8, 2025, sets disclosure requirements for the use of algorithmic pricing and prohibits the use of certain consumer data to set prices.Continue Reading New York Requires Disclosures for Personalized Pricing
“Chevron is overruled”: How Loper Bright Will Change the Regulatory Law Landscape
By Tamara Brightwell, Amy Caiazza, Jess Cheng, Jamillia Ferris, Steffen Johnson, Maneesha Mithal, Maureen Ohlhausen, Brent Snyder, Rachel Burke, Kelsey Curtis, Rebecca Weitzel Garcia, Troy Jenkins & Evan Moore on
Posted in Regulatory
In a decision with far-ranging implications for federal administrative law, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (Loper Bright).1 The Supreme Court’s six-Justice majority held that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires courts interpreting agency regulations to determine independently whether the agencies have acted within their statutory authority, even where the statute at issue is ambiguous. In so holding, the Court overruled its 1984 decision in Chevron USA v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which for the last four decades had governed thousands of cases involving federal agency interpretations of ambiguous laws.Continue Reading “Chevron is overruled”: How Loper Bright Will Change the Regulatory Law Landscape