Cédric Burton

Subscribe to Cédric Burton's Posts

On September 7, 2020, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) published draft guidelines (Guidelines) intended to clarify the roles of the parties processing personal data and when they are operating as controllers, joint controllers, or processors under the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Continue Reading Draft EDPB Guidelines Clarify the Roles of Parties Processing Personal Data and Call for Detailed Data Processing Agreements

On Monday September 7, 2020, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) issued draft Guidelines 8/2020 on the targeting of social media users (the “Draft Guidelines”). The Draft Guidelines have far-reaching implications for social media platforms, advertisers, and adtech companies, as they will result in a clarification of the roles and responsibilities of the key stakeholders, and establish rules for consent.

The Draft Guidelines are open for public consultation until October 19, 2020. Interested companies can submit their comments to the EDPB.
Continue Reading EDPB Issues Guidelines on Social Media Targeting Under GDPR

Over the last few days, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB), the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) and various Supervisory Authorities (SAs) across Europe issued statements addressing the decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to invalidate the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework (Schrems 2.0). Below we summarize some of the main reactions.

The EDPB is working on a set of FAQs that will hopefully provide some level of clarification on key issues that companies now face. The EDPB is meeting on July 22 and 23, and we expect the FAQs to be published shortly thereafter. We will report on these FAQs as soon as they are issued.
Continue Reading Initial Reaction of European Data Protection Regulators to Schrems 2.0 Judgment

On February 7, 2020, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) published draft guidelines on the processing of personal data in the context of connected vehicles and mobility related applications. If adopted in their current form, the draft guidelines will have far-reaching consequences for connected vehicles and mobility applications that operate in Europe. They contain detailed interpretations of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and related laws. Notably, the draft guidelines apply the EU cookie rules to connected vehicles, requiring granular consent to collect both personal and non-personal data from connected vehicles.
Continue Reading EU Privacy Regulators Issue Draft Guidelines on Connected Vehicles and Mobility Applications

On December 19, 2019, the Advocate General (AG) of the highest EU Court (the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)) issued his opinion in Schrems II[1] (the opinion). Wilson Sonsini previously covered the key points of the opinion in our Alert of December 20 and now provides a more detailed analysis in this contribution.

At stake in this case is the validity of two key EU data transfers mechanisms, the Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) and the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield. The SCCs allow companies to transfer personal data to any country outside of the European Economic Area. The Privacy Shield enables transfers specifically from the EU to the U.S.
Continue Reading CJEU Advocate General Confirms Validity of EU Data Transfer Tools

On January 21, 2020, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) published its final version of its Age Appropriate Design Code of Practice (the code). The code will be submitted to Parliament in the coming days, and, assuming there is no objection, will become effective approximately two months later.

This blog post follows our previous update on the ICO’s draft Age Appropriate Design Code. The current code was produced following extensive industry and consumer engagement. It adopts the maximum transition period of 12 months to allow companies to make meaningful and thoughtful changes to how they operate. 
Continue Reading Update: UK’s Age Appropriate Design Code