FTC Activities in 2021 and Likely Trends for 2022

2021 saw the kickoff of the Khan era at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). During FTC Chair Lina Khan’s first nine months on the job, she has announced privacy and security initiatives that offer important insights into her priorities. Companies should pay close attention to FTC activity in 2021 and public statements from FTC’s leadership to prepare for 2022. Here’s a list of 10 likely trends we can expect to see in 2022 (in no particular order):
Continue Reading 2021 Privacy and Cybersecurity Year in Review

On November 10, 2021, the UK Supreme Court ruled[1] that class representatives in data privacy class action suits need to prove damage or distress suffered to be successful. Compensation cannot be granted simply by virtue of proving that a company violated the law. The case was heard under the UK’s pre-2018 data protection law, but the UK GDPR arguably does not change the essence of the Court’s ruling.[2]
Continue Reading Lloyd v. Google: UK Supreme Court Rejects Data Protection Class Action in Landmark Ruling

As of September 27, 2021, companies relying on Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) to transfer personal data outside the European Union (EU) must use the new Standard Contractual Clauses (New SCCs) when signing data processing agreements. As a result, it is time to update template data processing agreements to ensure that your company can meet this deadline.
Continue Reading Don’t Forget to Use the New SCCs to Transfer EU Personal Data as of September 27, 2021

The Dutch supervisory authority (the Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens or AP) sanctioned the online travel booking platform, Booking.com BV (Booking), with a EUR 475,000 fine for failing to notify a data breach to the AP within 72 hours after becoming aware of it, as required by the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The decision is available in Dutch here.
Continue Reading Booking.com Fined EUR 475,000 for Failure to Timely Notify Dutch Supervisory Authority of Data Breach

On January 12, 2021, the District Court of the District of Columbia was the latest court to grant a motion to compel production of a forensic report prepared by an external security-consulting firm in data breach litigation.1 This case involved a cyberattack on a law firm that led to the public dissemination of the confidential information of the plaintiff, who was a former client of the firm. The plaintiff moved to compel his former law firm to produce “all reports of its forensic investigation into the cyberattack.”2 The defendant asserted that it had produced all relevant materials, including materials related to a second-track investigation conducted by its usual cybersecurity vendor, eSentire, for business continuity purposes. However, the plaintiff also sought a report prepared by Duff & Phelps, who was retained by the defendant’s outside litigation counsel. The defendant argued the Duff & Phelps report was protected by the work-product and attorney-client privileges. The court rejected the defendant’s arguments and ordered production of the Duff & Phelps report and associated materials.
Continue Reading Court Orders Production of a Data Breach Forensic Report, Rejecting Arguments That Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection Apply

On December 15, 2020, the European Commission (EC) unveiled a set of proposals to regulate digital platforms. The draft laws include antitrust-related requirements, addressed by the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and more general regulatory requirements, addressed in the Digital Services Act (DSA). The DMA/DSA package will apply to all digital services, including social media, online marketplaces, and other online platforms, meaning tech companies active in Europe will have a new set of rules to follow.
Continue Reading European Commission Proposes New Rules for Digital Platforms